George Schaub
Sort By: Post Date | Title | Publish Date
|
Dec 15, 2015
|
Dec 12, 2012
|
Dec 19, 2011 |
First Published: Nov 01, 2011
|
May 20, 2014 |
First Published: Apr 01, 2014
|
Jan 01, 2005
|
Jul 01, 2001


There’s no question that glossy and satin or pearl-type surfaces give an image more “pop,” but on the other hand you might want to use a matte surface to enhance the look and feel of certain images that rely less on pop than a quieter mood. It could be boiled down to a simple rule of thumb: for rich, high-saturation images you might use a glossy or semigloss; for more subtle colors it might be better to use a matte or satin. In the black-and-white realm it’s more of a toss-up but I think the same general rule applies. For example, for architectural images of adobe or stucco wall buildings I use matte; for glass and steel skyscrapers I choose glossy. Notice that I always modify the recommendations with “might”: if you really get into papers for printing you’ll make your own judgments. But there’s no denying that surface decisions play a role in overall effectiveness of the image.





