Quality, according to the old saying, doesn't cost: it pays. These new
manual-focus, Nikon-fit "ZF" lenses are a perfect illustration of
that saying. Sure, they are built by Hirofumi Kobayashi in Japan, but they are
built to Zeiss standards from Zeiss designs, and they feel like the Zeiss lenses
of yesteryear: smooth, solid, beautifully finished, with a lot of brass and
glass. They are clearly built to last. And, of course, they deliver stunning
pride of Nikons. Left to right: Nikon F with 50mm f/2 Makro-Planar
#00 000 014; D70 with 35mm f/2 Distagon #15 575 010; Nikkormat
with 25mm f/2.8 Distagon #00 000 009. The beauty of Nikon's
classic mount is that these lenses are backward-compatible for
the best part of half a century (the Nikon F mount was introduced
48 years ago, in 1959). Or you can put them on today's digital
SLRs, too, though our original D70 test shots for this article
were lost to a corrupt CompactFlash card.
All Photos © 2006, Roger W. Hicks, All Rights Reserved
Four new lenses were recently released to add to the existing 50mm f/1.4 and
85mm f/1.4, making six in all. They are the 25mm f/2.8 Distagon (10 glass, eight
group); the 35mm f/2 Distagon (nine glass, seven group); the 50mm f/2 Makro-Planar
(eight glass, six group, including one floating element); and the 100mm f/2
Makro-Planar (nine glass, eight group). Unfortunately, only the 25mm f/2.8,
35mm f/2, and 50mm f/2 were available for test. But we thought you would prefer
to read about three of them now, rather than all four at some indeterminate
The sizes and weights give some indication of the quality. The 25mm f/2.8 is
66mm long and 65mm in diameter (near enough 21/2" for each dimension)
and weighs 480 g (13.4 oz). The 35mm f/2 is physically the longest at 73mm (just
under 3") and is 65mm (21/2") in diameter, weighing 530 g (18.7
oz). The 50mm f/2 is 65mm (21/2") long and 72mm (just under 3")
in diameter and again weighs 530 g (18.7 oz). Admittedly, what is "pleasingly
solid" to one person will be "too heavy" to another, but these
all-metal mounts are built with supreme precision, and that's what top-quality
and chapel. The immense depth of field of a 25mm lens can sometimes
be useful, as can the "stretching" of the foreground
which makes the pool look much bigger than it is. I was actually
standing in a couple of inches of water at the edge of the pool
when I shot this. (Nikon F, Kodak Portra film.)
Some may say that these are collectors' items, too retro to be real.
In an era of autofocus zooms, who wants manual-focus prime lenses? Manual-focus
prime lenses for film cameras are undoubtedly a niche market. If you are a buyer
in that market, you will know exactly why these lenses exist, and you probably
want at least one of them.
The new lenses are all compatible with Nikon's 1959 F mount, and have
"rabbit ears" for coupling to older Photomic heads (and Nikkormats
and clip-on Nikon meters) as well as AI-S indexing for later manual-focus Nikons.
All focus in the conventional Nikon direction, clockwise for closer, and the
aperture rings (at the back of the lens, of course) turn clockwise for smaller
apertures. Engravings are mostly white-filled, with red for the feet on the
combined feet-meter focusing scales. Needless to say, these are filled engraved
marks, not silkscreened on.
25mm f/2.8 focuses amazingly close: 17cm, a bit under 7",
from the film plane. The once-familiar "rabbit ears"
are there to connect with the meters on earlier Nikons and Nikkormats;
the AI ridge is for later meters. Actually the lenses are AI-S,
with the tab and groove as well.
The beautifully finished all-metal lens hoods are three-claw external bayonet,
and reversible for storage. Approximate depths are 20mm (stepped) for the 25mm
f/2.8; 12mm (stepped) for the 35mm f/2; and 22mm (tubular) for the 50mm. All,
frankly, are somewhat vestigial. The 50mm, on the other hand, does not really
need a lens hood unless you are using a filter, because the front element is
very deeply recessed, maybe 40mm (15/8") or more from the front of the
Lens caps are pinch-type, and represent the only significant disadvantage to
the lenses: they are hard to grip, and slip out of your fingers all too easily.
The sizes (same as the filter sizes) are 58mm for the 25mm f/2.8 and 35mm f/2,
and 67mm for the 50mm f/2 macro.
50mm f/2 macro has a double helical rectilinear focusing mount
and cranks out a long way to focus at 1¼2 life size.
The 50mm f/2 macro has an actual focal length of 51.6mm and focuses through
about 300Þ to 1/2 life size at 24cm or rather under 10". The 35mm
f/2 is spot on 35mm and focuses through about 90Þ to 30cm or about 12":
this corresponds to almost 1/4 life size. The 25mm f/2.8 (true focal length
25.7mm) is the real surprise, focusing through about 320Þ to 17cm or a
bit over 6", for a little over half life size. Of course the subject is
only about 6cm, just over 2", from the front of the lens at this distance.
There is no mechanical diaphragm compensation to open up the aperture as you
focus closer, as there was on early 55mm f/3.5 Micro Nikkors, so you need either
to meter through the lens or to apply compensation factors for extreme close
focusing: as a rule of thumb, 1/2 stop for 1/4 life size and 1 stop for 1/2
D70 with 35mm f/2 Distagon, showing the bayonet-mount lens hood
which can be fitted or removed with the lens cap in place, though
it is much easier to fit or remove the rather evil pinch-fit cap
with the hood either off or reversed.
Operation of all focusing mounts and diaphragm controls is extremely smooth,
with positive click-stops on 1/2 stops from the maximum aperture to the f/22
minimum on each lens.