Please comment briefly on experiences you might have had with image stabilization systems, good or bad.

By Editor • Posted: Dec 2, 2004

Image stabilization lenses and camera systems offer the ability to shoot at slower shutter speeds than usual with a handheld camera. Is some form of image stabilization important to you as a feature when considering lens or camera purchase?

Yes, even a greater cost it's worth the ability to work with slower speeds.

84% (107 votes)

No, the extra cost is not worth it and I don't have the need for this handheld aid.

11% (14 votes)

Not sure, as the benefits of image stabilization are not that clear to me.

5% (6 votes)

Total votes: 127

Comments

Submitted by Don Mapes on June 5, 2011 - 4:29pm.

I have shot several pageants with very low light and gotten sharp images with IS. It's been a great feature.

Submitted by A. Hunt on June 5, 2011 - 4:29pm.

IS lenses have consistently helped me in low light situations where the trip[od is not available.

Submitted by Michael on June 5, 2011 - 4:29pm.

Unfortunately, however, my current 28-135 IS only offers little more in exchange for a "slower" lens. I am not sure if there is a tradeoff.

Submitted by John on June 5, 2011 - 4:29pm.

The good experience of a friend with an Olympus with stabilization means I need to consider it seriously. If it can reduce the times when a tripod is needed, hurrah!