First you need to define "high quality" because unlike film cameras, the image quality from a DSLR is proportional to the price you pay for it. Then there is the weight and size issue. DSLRs are dependent on batteries and are usually slightly larger and heavier than their film counterparts. I still use my CoolPix 5000 for that reason, even though I have a D70. I have beautiful 12x18 prints made from my CoolPix 5000 files. But either the Canon or Nikon entry level DSLR (or one model up) will probably be fine for you.

I suggest you take a look at the Olympus E-1 or the Evolt. The E-1 goes for around $1200 body only and is directed towards pro users. The Evolt is an entry level camera and goes for around $900 body only. They both use only Olympus made for digital lenses and are a bit expensive but are of high quality. Both cameras are DSLRS but are small and lighter than most DSLRS, in particular the Evolt.

Quote:
I really am needing a digital SLR, but have no idea what to look for. I would like one that gives me high quality pictures, but dosen't cost me an arm and a leg. I travel a lot so it needs to be light weight and fairly small. Any help I can get will be very much apreciated. Thank you.

Why don't we ever see questions like this...

I want a digital camera with low quality, costs alot and
weighs a ton to carry?

HI.
hey, get off the internet, and ask a friend who is interested in photography, and who s(he) considers a good dealer. If there is a local photography shop in your area, go there, and ask lots of questions. If the guy (gal) is honest, you will learn a bunch. And you should be able to tell in a heartbeat what the dealer is--either willing to help, or willing to sell! If you live near a college, see what is offered in beginning photography classes. The instructor will have a ton of advise, and about a half a ton of good advise!
Ask your friends!