Help!

sorcadmin's picture

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE WRITING TO HELP!
The volume of letters to this column is increasing every month. To be able to continue to offer this service, we need your cooperation.
Please keep HELP! letters brief and to the point. We ask that you confine yourself to only one question per letter. Letters should be typed. If you cannot have the letter typed, then please print clearly. We get many hand written letters which we simply cannot read, and for this reason they are not answered.

Although we make every effort, we cannot promise to answer every letter. Time simply does not allow us to answer questions which have been answered already in the HELP! column or in one of our articles in a recent issue.

Once you have written to us, please be patient. It takes us a while to have the time to look over the letters and send them to our HELP! staff for reply. Answers require a minimum of 30 days, some may take three or four months due to necessary research time.

When sending a response to a previous question, please include the month and page of the original question.

All letters to HELP! must be accompanied by a stamped, self addressed envelope to be considered for reply. Foreign readers should send an International Reply Coupon, available from any post office.

The purpose of the HELP! column is to provide solutions to photographic problems, to find sources of supply and to identify cameras. HELP! is not a pricing or appraisal service, and cannot provide values for old equipment. There are several good guide books available from our advertisers which give prices. Thanks for your cooperation!

A number of readers wrote offering assistance after we recently ran a HELP! inquiry letter asking about an adapter to permit using a No. 76 silver battery in place of the discontinued PX13 or PX625 mercury batteries. An advertiser, C.R.I.S offers the MR-9 adapter, which will serve this purpose. They sell for $29.95 plus S&H. Either check a recent issue for their ad or call (800) 216-7579 to obtain more information about this device. This same firm also has No. 76 batteries available. A less costly alternative battery substitute is the Weincell PX13 equivalent battery which is available through any Tiffen/Saunders dealer. We appreciate our readers pointing out this battery solution of which we were not previously aware.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I have a big problem and I need your advice urgently. Before I moved here, I was basically photographing people in New York City for 18 years. But here in Ghana you have to be an all-around photographer to get jobs. I have experimented, read many books, and have a clear understanding about the subject lighting, camera angle, reflective and translucent objects. I use a 35mm camera. When I shoot products, I don't get a sharp picture. But, ironically, when I use the same camera and lenses to shoot people, I get them crisply sharp. I have three cameras including a brand new Nikon FM2 and new lenses, 50mm and 105mm, but I have the same problem with all three cameras. The products I shoot are not tiny products therefore they do not require bellows on the camera. Whether or not I shoot with a close-up lens attached to the camera's lens, the result is still blurry pictures. I am talking about sharpness not depth of field. What amazes me the most is the focusing distance of these products I shoot is within the camera's lens focusing distance range. I'm so worried about this problem because I'm losing clients. Please advise me on how to rectify this problem. Could a macro lens or an APO lens give me sharp close-up shots? Incidentally, my infinity shots are not sharp either. I use ISO 100 films. I'm impatiently waiting for your advice before I purchase the appropriate lens or equipment for my close-up shots. I'll be moving up to a 4x5 view camera soon. Is the Schneider 150mm APO a good lens for close-ups and for photographing people?
Kwasi Brenya
Accra, North Ghana
West Africa

A. It is difficult to critique your problem long distance with only your few comments and two images to look at, but I will provide my best estimate of solving the problem you have. The sample 5x7 color product print of hair care bottles you sent does not appear to be as critically sharp as the portrait. I assume you are using Nikkor lenses on your Nikon camera bodies, not some off-brand lenses. If so, how are you determining focus? Do you use autofocus or manual focus via the viewfinder screen? I know the FM2N is manual focus, but you did not say what the other cameras were. Is it possible the interchangeable focusing screen is not seated properly, thus the image appears sharply focused in the viewfinder but would not be critically sharp at the film plane? If all of your pictures are unsharp this could be the problem. If you have a diopter adjustment on the viewfinder eyepiece, this may be adjusted incorrectly. But, why are your portraits sharp and products not? That is puzzling. Another possibility is the color lab is using automated printing equipment (enlarger) which is out of alignment. Have you had the same negatives printed at another lab to check on this? Good quality close-up lenses used on prime lenses such as your 50mm and 105mm should produce sharply detailed images. A true prime macro lens (such as the Nikkor Micro 60mm, 105mm, or 200mm) would be a good lens. However, a macro zoom lens only has closer focusing capability than a similar zoom range lens, so it is not a true macro lens. The Schneider 150mm APO would be a good lens for your 4x5 camera, but it is comparable in focal length to a 50mm or 60mm lens on 35mm format. For medium-size product photography done on a 4x5 my preference would be at least a 180mm and better yet, about 210 to 240mm for a medium telephoto effect with less distortion of the product. I hope this brief analysis helps you find and correct your problem. Good luck in your new business. Don't get discouraged.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I have an old Pho-Tak camera. It takes 620 film which I know is discontinued. It says Pho-Tak, Reflex I 14mm color corrected Bochmar Precision lens. It is lacking a spool at the receiving end. I was wondering if there is any type of adapter I could use so that I can continue using this camera. Someone told me 120 film would fit, but it is lacking the 620 spool. I would appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks.
Nicole M. Benevento
Gainesville, FL

A. First the bad news. Although 120 film is identical to 620 in size, the spool is slightly thicker and larger in diameter, so 120 film normally will not fit into the narrower film supply slot of most 620 cameras. If this were the situation, there would be thousands of happy 620 users today. A few firms do stock some 620 film though, so you might be able to locate the correct size film to use. Now, as to locating a 620 spool. Check with some local large photofinishers (not one hour labs as they normally do not process roll film) and ask if they have a 620 spool they will sell you. If this does not pan out, ask your friends if they have an old 620 camera and if so, could you have a take-up spool since they undoubtedly don't use it because of the scarcity of that size film. Sometimes progress and evolution makes older usable products into doorstops. Ever try to find an 8-track tape these days?
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I prefer prints, yet I get slide film and get prints of the shots I like best. Do I lose the best results when doing it this way? What film has given optimal results, and what speed?
William Mottram
via Internet

A. Slide film is normally preferred for magazine reproduction because it has a broader tonal range and generally more saturated colors than color negative material. Besides you are at the mercy of the lab printing the color negatives, which can also alter the color balance if they don't keep close watch on their processing. Shooting slide film then having prints made is generally more expensive and tends to lose quality as most reversal color printing papers tend to build up contrast not apparent on the original slide. In general, the slower film speeds of any material--slide or color negative--will give the optimal results. That is an ISO 100 or slower film speed. The color balance and rendering of specific critical items (such as Caucasian flesh tones, blue sky, whites, etc.) can vary in different brands of film and even in similar named films from one firm or brand. That's my personal opinion in a nutshell. Hope this assists you.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. Thank you for all the wonderful helpful info you have presented in the HELP! column. I have a question that has been bugging me for a dozen years. Back when I had a Contaflex III I utilized a Zeiss monocular for a long lens, attached via a 27mm filter thread (Contaflex size) on the monocular, which was exposed when the rubber eyepiece was unscrewed. When I moved to a more modern SLR I fashioned a filter adapter by machining a 27mm hole into a metal 58mm (Canon size) lens cap and epoxying an empty 27mm into place to provide a 58-27mm step-down ring. I later found a 52-27 ring at another show which enabled the use of this rig on my Nikon SLR without further adapters. My question is this--is the 27mm (0.5mm) thread size a standard that is employed in telescopes or other devices that makes sense to manufacture these adapters? Nobody seems to know at the trade shows, and the two dealers I bought mine from had no idea what these were used for. I would appreciate your help as this might just open my world to other things I could experiment with. I am already thinking of using the monocular with my Nikon CP900 digital, especially if I can find a ready-made adapter. Thank you.
John F. Yoder
Seabrook, TX

A. I don't have any personal experience trying to adapt viewing monoculars or scopes to a camera, but I have heard of this being done to circumvent the expense of buying a long telephoto when a similar optic is already owned. I checked a recent catalog from a firm that is a source for odd sizes of filters and adapters. (The Camera People, phone/fax: (970) 884-6045). They list a 27-37mm step-up ring and 37-49 or 52mm which are more common camera lens thread sizes today, but don't have a step-down adapter in 27mm. They checked references and found out that B+W filters, imported by Schneider does list a 27-49mm adapter. You can contact Schneider Optics at (516) 761-5000. To check a bit further, I called Tiffen who has offered filters and adapters for many years. They used to have 27mm products but do not now. They gave me the names of two dealers that might have the 27mm step-down adapter you seek. They are: Damar Photo Supply in Savannah, GA; (912) 925-9808, ask for Dave Bellnoff. Another is Chambless Equipment in Ellijay, GA; (706) 636-5210. I trust that one or more of these leads might be able to assist you. You don't have to make your own adapters.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I am a new subscriber. I have one question that is important as I am buying new equipment. I have a Sunpak 555 flash with TTL and a meter in my Nikon F3. Why would I ever need an exposure or flash meter?
Bill Mottram
Davie, FL

A. My Nikon catalog shows the Nikon F3HP (which I assume is the model you have) has a basic center-weighted metering system and it has TTL flash control. Again, I believe you may have the powerful grip model Sunpak AF 555 flash (or possibly the somewhat less versatile hot shoe Sunpak 355, as I could not read your handwritten letter very well). Both are capable of working with your Nikon SLR for TTL metering so they read the light actually reaching the camera through the camera lens. If you have the grip flash unit, and the proper synch cords, you can hold it off the camera for better lighting than what you normally get from a hot shoe flash connected directly above the camera lens. For this you would not need a flash meter. But, if you plan to use two or more flash units, or AC powered studio flash units, the camera's internal flash metering cannot properly read the output from two (or more) flashes. This is when you would need a handheld flash meter to determine the correct aperture to set on the lens. The center-weighted metering in your camera is excellent for general photography. But if you happen to take pictures in overly white conditions (as in the snow, unlikely there in Florida) or if you photograph a person in white against a pitch black background, the center-weighted meter might not determine the best exposure. This is when a handheld meter (particularly one with incident light metering capability) would be helpful. In general, I don't believe you would need a handheld exposure or flash meter unless you take pictures under very unusual conditions. Besides, if you work with color negative or black and white film, they have sufficient exposure latitude, which will minimize any minor exposure error. Only if you work with more sensitive color slide film do you need more precise exposure control. I hope this clarifies the situation for you.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I would like to ask HELP! to assist me in finding information and an instruction booklet for a Gossen Sixti light meter for use on a camera accessory shoe. The light meter is approximately the size of a Leica M meter.
Dr. Josef E. Herz
Houston, TX

A. There are two main sources for instructions for older equipment that I know of. They are: John S. Craig, Box 1637, Torrington, CT 06790; (860) 496-9791 and Finger Lakes Photo Books, PO Box 309, Aurora, NY 13026; (315) 364-9581. Have you checked with the current importer of Gossen products? For a number of years these meters have been available through Bogen Photo Corp., 565 E Crescent Ave., Ramsey, NJ 07446; (201) 818-9500. Hopefully one of these firms will have the Gossen Sixti meter book you seek.
Robert E. Mayer

Q. I have a problem I can't solve and neither can the local camera stores. Enclosed are two pictures of a Nikon 250 shot back and motorized drive for a Nikon camera. I'd like to use it but I need to buy a Nikon camera to match it and don't know which model Nikon to buy. Can you help? Thanks much.
Cal Carter
Sherman Oaks, CA

A. It's rather difficult to determine exactly which Nikon 250 magazine back you have from the Polaroid you sent. Is it the model MF-4 250 magazine? If so, my contact at Nikon told me it was intended for the older Nikon F3 body. You might want to contact Nikon customer service at (800) 626-4566 when you have the back with you so you can give them any identification data found on the back. Then they should be able to positively identify the camera it was intended for. It's frustrating to have an accessory product you want to use, but don't know the proper components (camera body in this instance) to make it functional. We hope this steers you in the right direction.
Robert E. Mayer

Share | |