Sort By: Post Date | Title | Publish Date
Sep 01, 2003
0 comments
Mar 01, 2002
0 comments
Feb 01, 2011
0 comments
Jan 01, 2007
0 comments
Jan 01, 2007
0 comments
Jun 01, 2008
0 comments
Jun 01, 2008
0 comments
Jun 01, 2010
0 comments
Sep 01, 2008
1 comments
Dec 12, 2012
0 comments
Dec 01, 2000
0 comments
| Cameras Other | Techniques Site Features | Blogs Archived Blogs Refreshers | More Articles | Columns eCommerce | News Resources |

.jpg)

.jpg)












There’s no question that glossy and satin or pearl-type surfaces give an image more “pop,” but on the other hand you might want to use a matte surface to enhance the look and feel of certain images that rely less on pop than a quieter mood. It could be boiled down to a simple rule of thumb: for rich, high-saturation images you might use a glossy or semigloss; for more subtle colors it might be better to use a matte or satin. In the black-and-white realm it’s more of a toss-up but I think the same general rule applies. For example, for architectural images of adobe or stucco wall buildings I use matte; for glass and steel skyscrapers I choose glossy. Notice that I always modify the recommendations with “might”: if you really get into papers for printing you’ll make your own judgments. But there’s no denying that surface decisions play a role in overall effectiveness of the image. 




