|
Recent Additions
Cameras
Other Digital Darkroom Portraiture Sports/Action Lighting Outdoor/Travel Wildlife Film & Processing Photo Allies Blog Co-Op Forums Galleries Photo News Past eNewsletters David B. Brooks Jon Sienkiewicz Turn Your Hobby Into Cash Industry Voice Glossary Trade Shows Workshops Photo Links Shutterbug Radio Manufacturers Contact Us Outdoor Tips Travel Tips Portrait Tips Sports Tips Lens Tips Software Tips Family Tips Instant Links Editor's Notes Talking Pictures Picture This! Features Book Reviews Student Union Point of View Web Profiles Exhibits Photo Clubs News & Notes Help Digital Help Business Trends Digital Innovations Globetrotter Master Class Passport The Darkroom Dealer Locator Catalog Showcase Shutterbug Shopper Photo Lab Showcase Service Directory Classifieds Photography Lighting Digital Photography Equipment Film Processing Lexar Media Camera Lenses |
Canon’s imagePROGRAF iPF5000 17” Printer; A New Wide Format Pigment Ink Printer
About a year ago Canon announced new pigment ink professional wide format printers for the US market. Initially, the smallest of these Canon printers available in Japan, the 17” wide, was not slated for the US market. Not long after, Canon announced the PIXMA Pro9500 printer, a new 13” pigment ink printer. I responded immediately to this announcement, requesting a unit for test and evaluation as soon as available. Months went by and I again contacted Canon about the PIXMA Pro9500 and found out its release had been moved back to 2007. Canon suggested I might like to test and review the imagePROGRAF iPF5000 17” wide format inkjet instead, which used the same inks and similar technology. My curiosity got the best of me, and I wanted to see how Canon has dealt with pigment ink printing.
At first glance the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF5000 printer appears to share the
basic configuration of other large format printers, with controlled paper feed
and a print head that shuttles across the print media as it travels through
the printer. Upon closer inspection I saw that the Canon iPF5000 is quite distinguished
from other inkjet printers. Although piezo print head technology has not been
associated with Canon, apparently they did significant research on the matter,
patenting their approach to that technology in the 1970s, prior to their concentration
on their BubbleJet technology for dye ink printing.
The two print heads are user installed, making replacement costs moderate,
if ever required. I am told there are 30,720 nozzles, with each head handling
six colors using 2560 nozzles for each color, laying down 4 picoliter ink droplets.
The Canon print system has a self-diagnostic capability. This senses a nonfunctioning
nozzle and automatically transfers printing to other nozzles. In addition, a
self-diagnostic routine also runs a cleaning cycle automatically when needed.
The software driver support for the Canon iPF5000 includes the usual operating
system 8-bit driver for both Windows and Apple Mac computers that also includes
a monochrome capability, supporting grayscale black and white printing with
color tone control. In addition, Canon provides a plug-in which is essentially
a 16-bit software RIP that runs in either Photoshop or Canon’s Digital
Photo Professional application, the latter is supplied with all Canon EOS D-SLR
cameras. This is for printing HDR 16-bit or raw digital camera files that are
directly processed (rasterized) and sent to the iPF5000. This approach reproduces
a fuller gamut content of the file while providing smoother tonal gradations
and superior color/tonal separations. The Canon iPF5000 comes with interface
support for both USB 2.0 and network printing; a FireWire interface connection
may be added as an extra cost option.
I was impatient to get the printer set up and the drivers installed, which
went smoothly and without a hitch, mostly because I forced myself to follow
the documented instructions to the letter. I often just charge ahead, assuming
I know what I am doing, and then find out the hard way that I might have to
go back to square one. I was glad to have everything running correctly and confirmed
by an initial test print, because there was much more “fiddly” stuff
to do before I could get serious about test printing. Because I had media that
was not made by Canon I had to profile each paper, which is a bit tedious and
even boring when you’ve done it many, many times before. But it was really
not that long before I could make some test prints with the profiles I’d
made.
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






