| |
|
 |
After
Photos © 1999, Monte Zucker, All Rights Reserved
|
|
So, you think that the timing
still isn't right for you to get into digital? Well, wake up.
You're only fooling yourself.
You have all sorts of excuses why you haven't gotten around to
it, don't you? The truth of the matter is, you may be a little
scared. In addition, you probably think that you can't relate
to digital in your area of photography.
I felt the same way, for a while at least. Now, I don't know how
I could still be in photography without the help of the little digital
manipulation that I do to my portraits. Take a look-see at some of my
applications of Photoshop to the images that I created in my recent
Sarasota portrait/wedding workshop.
The pictures looked pretty good to begin with. There was a time when
I would have been satisfied with what I got back from my lab, but not
any more. I'm sure that you'll agree with me after reading
this article. I'll walk you through some of the steps that I took
with each of these images to take them from regular to what I think
is pretty spectacular.
|
| |
|
 |
|
The guy in Photo 1 with his
female companion needed just some simple corrections from start to finish.
When I put my photos into Photoshop the first thing I do is Image/Adjust/Auto
Levels. That sort of picks up the color, usually warms the skin tones
and does some fine-tuning that I don't trust my eye to do. I do
this with all of my images once they're scan-ned and in my computer.
The next step is to adjust the contrast. I do this with my own contrast
mask system that I learned from a friend. This opens up the detail throughout
the picture. I can't begin to tell you how excited I get when I
see everything that's lurking in the shadows and highlights.
For this first picture, my next basic change was to crop it from a square
into a 10/8 horizontal format. I did that to take the attention away from
his hat and to place their eyes above center in the composition. Then,
it was simply a matter of getting rid of some of the distracting areas
in the photograph. In particular, I cloned out the bit of his arm that
was in the bottom of the picture. Then, I attacked the highlights in the
background on the left side of the picture. Finally, I brightened their
eyes and teeth a little.
|
|
None of these alone seemed
like much. Putting them all together made quite a difference, didn't
it?
Sometimes It Can Be So Subtle, Until You Compare. Then, there's
Photo 2 of the mother with her two children. Not much to do here over
and above doing my regular routine with color and contrast that I do on
all my photographs. Or is there? Why not clean up the sidewalk? Get rid
of that line that's going right through the boys' heads. And
while we're at it, it wouldn't take more than a few moments
to clean up some of those lines on the mother's neck. They're
not there ordinarily, it's just the way I've got her posed.
Just A Few Minutes, But It Sure Helps, Doesn't It? How about bridal
portraits? People think that with digital you don't have to have
much to begin with. I couldn't disagree more. But there are some
things that can be easily corrected and you'd never know, except
if you were to compare them with the originals.
Let's take a look at Photo 3, for instance. That curl coming out
from behind her neck was something that I missed when I made the portrait.
Hey, no problem. Just "select" that area of the picture and
clone in some of her veil from the other side. Not bad, huh?
At the same time, why not smooth out some of those facial lines? What
I did here was create a soft focus layer over the entire portrait and
then erase some of that layer to reveal the original sharp version of
the picture. By doing that I was able to keep sharpness in their eyes,
lips and other defined areas of the image. I used to try to accomplish
the same thing with special lenses and filters. Now, I can see exactly
what I'm doing and know just how far I want to go with the softness
and sharpness. No surprises.
|
|
A Magician? Not Really. But
Magical Powers, To Be Sure. Always have the "ideal" bridal
couple? Everyone can be "ideal," if you know how to handle
them. Digital, of course, can be a big part of that. I know that when
I truly flatter people who are not model-type brides and grooms they're
forever grateful. Take a look at the couple in Photos 4 and 5.
Great smiles. Great people. They deserve the best for their bridal portraits.
With the help of Photoshop I can give them more than their best. I can
take their dreams and make them a reality.
For starters, I cropped Photo 4 into a vertical composition to create
an optical illusion of taller and thinner. That wasn't enough for
me, however. I wanted to flatter them even more. Digitally, it was simple.
I drew a straight line down from the archway to the bottom of the picture
and cloned the brickwork down to cover the edge of her gown. Then, I simply
followed one of the folds of her gown from beneath her arm to the bottom
of the portrait, "selecting" the area of her gown and veil
that I wanted to erase from the portrait. I then picked up some of the
dark color beneath the arch and filled it into that area at 100 percent.
Of course, I had to soften the edges of my work with another Photo-shop
tool. Simple and quick.
|
| |
|
 |
|
Darken a little of her chin
and neck? Why not? Every little bit helps, doesn't it? Of course,
you don't want to make it look artificial. If you didn't see
the comparison, side by side, you probably wouldn't even suspect
that anything had been done at all.
The same couple inside the church (Photo 5) has a combination of things
happening. First of all, posing them within the pews of the church was
a great beginning. Then, the first specific thing I did to that picture
was to crop it horizontally to get rid of some of the unnecessary foreground.
After that, I noticed that the book beneath his right hand was a slight
distraction. That vanished in seconds.
The fun part of working with this image was shaping her body. By "selecting"
that part of her that I (and she) would have preferred not to have showing
in the picture. It was then another easy process to bring over some of
the pews from the other side of her arm and fill in the area that I wanted
to cover. Difficult? Not at all. Effective? Do we have to even ask.
|
| |
|
 |
|
Once that was done I began
looking at other small things I could improve. How about cutting out a
little of the tension from her right hand? Sure, so I shaved off the tips
of her fingers in seconds.
While we're at it, we may as well clean up the spotlights in the
ceiling and the heating vents. Even the microphone on the dias left. Anything
else? Once you've started having fun this way, you can keep going
just as long as you keep it subtle.
I Didn't Part The Waters. One of the fun things I just finished
is when I was experimenting on the beach with the couple in the final
series of pictures. These pictures were made so late in the day (into
the night) that I had to use a flashlight to set the exposure on my lens.
I used a flash that was 2 f/stops over the ambient light to make the background
go still darker and side lit the first picture.
I really liked the lighting on the man's profile in Photo 6a. I
also liked her dark profile against the light sandy background. The main
thing that I didn't like was the bright sandy background on the
left. It was created by the flash for his profile lighting.
|
|
The sand on the portrait that
immediately followed the first picture (Photo 6b) was much better. The
flash was behind the couple. What to do?
I know. How about cutting the bright sandy part of the picture out completely
and then moving what was left onto the second picture. It was that simple.
Then, just softening the edges where they were blended together.
Fun? Exciting? Now, don't tell me you couldn't get into stuff
like this. I know you could. And if I can do it, anyone can. Don't
forget, I'm the "old retired guy." The one who just
keeps going and going and going and going.
No batteries here. Just excitement, determination, and a desire to keep
up with the changing times.
Still think digital isn't for you? Oh, yes. Sure, you're still
waiting. For what? I don't know. Do you?
|