Quick as a flash I e-mailed Yanina in Ukraine to tell her of my displeasure
at receiving a fake Reid for more than I cared to pay for such a curiosity.
She e-mailed me back in broken English, "I do not say it is not a copy.
Please see the auction again." There it was in black and white: "Reid
I with Taylor Inch f/2 lens copy Leica copy." The word "copy"
appeared twice--in her own inimitable fashion she had honestly listed it
as a copy of a Leica copy. She had me dead to rights! So I e-mailed Yanina again
to tell her that she was correct, and an honest seller, but that I was still
not happy to pay $118.50 for a camera that was worth (to me) about $50. I proposed
that she refund $68.50 to my PayPal account, which she did two days later. All
credit to her for being an honest seller and for going beyond her contractual
obligations to make me happy, and the Doofus Award to me for not reading her
eBay posting more carefully. Fortunately, this tale has a happy ending, but
the message to buyers bitten by the eBay bug is clear.
The bottom line: Base plate lock guide should say open, not "opened"
and closed--proof that my "Reid" is not what it
purports to be.
Compared to the Leica copy copy saga, the IIIf switcheroo is relatively tame,
but with an aggravating twist. In brief, my next bid was on a nice clean Leica
IIIf black (flash sync) dial, no self-timer, with equally pristine 50mm f/2
Summitar lens (not quite as sharp as the Summicron at f/2 and f/2.8, but a darn
good picture taker and a relative bargain at $100 or so). It included a nice
original leather case, and my winning bid was $313. Three days later the package
arrived and when I opened it, there was a Leica all right--a black-finished
Leica CL in nice shape with matching 40mm f/2 Summicron lens and a ratty case!
I guess I should have been overjoyed because the CL is worth about $100 more
than the IIIf, but I wasn't. I immediately called the seller, a major
eBay retailer in Florida, to tell him about the screw-up. "Yes, my packing
guy made a bad mistake," he admitted. "There were two Leicas we
sold on the same day for $313 and he sent both cameras to the wrong people.
The other buyer is a camera store on Long Island, and we'll contact him
and ask him to send the camera back to you directly, but if he won't cooperate,
there's nothing much we can do--it doesn't pay to sue him.
Of course if you send the CL back to us we'll refund your money, but let's
see if we can arrange a direct swap between you and the other buyer--we'll
pay the postage."
Hard case: Few camera copiers take the trouble of making a phony
leather case, but this one did! Note freehand Reid logo that differs
very slightly from those on the camera top and lens cap.
Charming. Well, after about five days of indecision (the other buyer was sick
and out of the office) we finally arranged the swap, and in about a week I had
my Leica IIIf. It's very pretty--cosmetically between Excellent plus
and Mint minus--but the slow speeds didn't work. I removed the lens
and looked at the shutter as I wound and fired the camera. The cause of the
problem: a big hole in the second shutter curtain. Also, the secondary rangefinder
image was none too bright. Yes, the seller in Florida was willing to take the
IIIf back, but I decided to have it fixed by Essex Camera Repair Service of
Carlstadt, New Jersey, who did a great job overhauling it for $200. The seller
agreed to deposit $100 in my PayPal account, so $100 worth of the repair was
on my dime.
Am I happy? Yes, reasonably happy but not ecstatic. I figure a really clean,
fully functional IIIf black dial with Summitar is worth $413 and a little agita,
but I wouldn't have bought it on eBay for that price. More importantly,
I could've done just as well, minus the agita, if I had taken myself down
to the nearest camera emporium and examined the merchandise in person before
taking out my credit card. I could have even bought it with a 10-day return
privilege and actually run some film through it--an option offered by very
few eBay sellers.
Oh yes, in the interest of absolute honesty I should tell you that my third
and last purchase on eBay went off without a hitch. I snagged a very clean (E+)
Contax IIa rangefinder camera, a '53 Zeiss Ikon black shutter speed dial
classic, with 50mm f/1.5 Sonnar lens (quite good even by today's standards)
for $315 with never-ready case (somebody cut the integral carrying straps off!).
When I called the seller, he said I was in luck--the post office truck
had arrived the instant he'd finished packing it--and I had it in
my hands the very next day! Luckily, the shutter works perfectly at all speeds--not
always the case with rangefinder Contaxes.
I guess you could say that the Contax was my one true eBay Adventures success
story. I saved roughly $50-$75 off the
low-end camera store price, I got what I expected, and I received it in short
order. However, if there had been a little fungus in the lens, or the iris diaphragm
was sticky, or the shutter speeds were off, I'd have to spend perhaps
2-3 times the amount I saved to make it right--as I decided to do with
the Leica IIIf. Luckily for me, all the eBay sellers I dealt with were on the
up and up, but there are definitely some scuzzballs out there and eBay will
not compensate your losses if you get stuck--unless you use PayPal and
deal with preferred PayPal sellers only, which is not always possible.
Yeah, eBay will post bad feedback to give unaccommodating sellers a bad rep
and remove really dishonest ones, but they won't get you a refund--and
frankly I have my doubts about their abilities to police bad sellers who re-up
under different names. In short, eBay claims that they exist to facilitate transactions
and cannot be held responsible for any fraudulent actions by seller or buyers.
But they certainly don't mind taking a healthy cut of the action! Ah,
the joys of capitalism! The operative imperative: Caveat Emptor! The preferred
choice: Examine that collectible camera in the metal at a camera dealer before
finalizing your purchase.