The Ladder; In Defense Of Imitation

sorcadmin's picture

It was something I read in a magazine not too long ago that inspired this column. The writer was talking about the three levels of creativity: imitative, adaptive, and innovative. I wish I could remember the context, but I made a quick connection to photography. We're imitative at the start; we copy others. Then we're adaptive; we make what we've imitated our own. Then we become inventive; we create out of our judgment and life experience.

Thank you, Jay Maisel.
All Photos © 2007, Jack Hollingsworth, All Rights Reserved

Those three stages instantly clicked with me (no pun intended). When we start out as photographers, no matter whether we're amateur or pro, I think we spend a period of time being not much more than the sum of our influences. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact, it's encouraged: we're told to study other photographers, see what they're doing, get inspiration from them. But my next thought was this: at what point do we start to move up the ladder? When do we stop imitating and adapting and start creating?

Hanging out with Bob Krist.

I thought about my own work over the years, and once I'd decided to use the three levels idea as a topic for a column, I had no choice but to look back at a lot of my photographs and see if I could find points of demarcation. And you know what? I couldn't. I saw no clear lines, no point where I could say, okay, here's where I stopped adapting and started to innovate, to create my own way of doing things. But I saw a transition, a change take place, and the photos you see here are a rough chronology of that change. I saw also that nothing I imitated or adapted ever really went away. It's still there--or elements of it are--but it's not who I am as a photographer today.

At the start I read about the masters of photography and studied their work. I checked out my contemporaries. I didn't have the Internet then--I attended shows and went to galleries and spent hours in bookstores and libraries. I certainly didn't have a style. I'd see something and think, I like this, it looks good. Because I was aspiring to be a professional, I also thought, this sells, so I'm going to try to do it this way. My recognition of what I thought was good came from what I saw on printed pages and gallery walls; then I set out to recognize similar things in life.

A touch of Lisl Dennis.

After a while I began to approach the second stage. I adapted what I liked in the work of others to what I was starting to think of as my style. I'd think, I like the way Richard Avedon does portraits, but I'm going to add my touch to it, my ideas. So, for example, after imitating his distance from a subject, I discovered I liked to back up a little and include, or suggest, something else in the frame. I was more comfortable with that; I liked it better. A small step, but I was on my way. Soon I was no longer making a conscious effort to mimic what I'd seen and liked. I was seeing and liking on my own. And one day I discovered I was just doing my thing.

Article Contents
Share | |
Comments
boby's picture
A good blog always comes-up

A good blog always comes-up with new and exciting information and while reading I have feel that this blog is really have all those quality that qualify a blog to be a good one
testking NS0-154|testking N10-005|testking 640-553|testking JN0-660|testking 640-721|testking 640-801|testking 642-983|testking 642-617|