Forums
Home » Forums » Digital SLRs » Canon User Group
3 replies [Last post]
dsarti's picture
Submitted By: dsarti
Location: Lebanon Tennessee USA
Joined: Jan 7 2006
Posts:
Image stabilization
Posted: January 3, 2007 - 5:24pm

I wish Canon would switch there image stabilization to the sensor. In the film days stabilizing the lens was the best way, but now it seems more logical to stabilize the sensor.

Top
ronk II's picture
Submitted By: ronk II
Joined: Oct 2 2006
Posts:
#1
Re: Image stabilization
Posted: January 3, 2007 - 6:40pm

David,
That would be poor marketing on Canon's part, however logical and practical.

Top
20DNewbie's picture
Submitted By: 20DNewbie
Joined: Jun 4 2006
Posts:
#2
Re: Image stabilization
Posted: January 17, 2007 - 12:28am

Yeah but then if the IS started acting all screwy I'd have to send the body in(most people I know haven't a back-up) and not be able to shoot. I'd rather send one lens and still have the ability to go play.

Just my take on the in body IS debate, not that that means anything.

Top
lucadiana's picture
Submitted By: lucadiana
Location: Wyoming (USA), Sardinia (Italy)
Joined: Feb 7 2007
Posts:
#3
Re: Image stabilization
Posted: February 13, 2007 - 12:19am

I prefer the way Canon has it. If the IS was on the sensor it would have to be generic with lower quality results. Being in the lens each IS is fitted for that lens only optimizing the results.

Luca

Top

 

  •  
  •