I own a CSC and am pleased with results.

I will consider one as an option to, or even a replacement for my DSLR when next in the market for a camera.

I'll stick with my DSLR.

I look at lab tests first to see if I would be at all interested in a camera.

I rely on field tests done by a reliable reporter as most important.

I use both lab and field tests to make buying decisions.

I find no problem editing videos with my current software.

Editing videos is a challenge that I have yet to overcome.

I need to know more about video editing from my camera.

I use fast lenses for low light work and when I want shallow depth of field.

I use high ISO settings and image stabilization, in lenses or in-camera, to enable low light shooting.

For me, it's a question of cost, and I know fast lenses are more expensive, so budget concerns dictate I use image stabilization

I engage in activities that would make it make sense to use one, or I already own one.

I don't usually think about making pictures when I hike, raft, kayak or ski.

I know they are available but they don't deliver the quality I am used to.

Find yourself using more and more in-camera "filters" and processing options.

Shoot the image and then do all your processing later in the computer or pad.

Do some on-board processing but leave the "heavy lifting" to computer software.

The features in these cameras make me think I could use one as my main camera.

I see these as good for snapshots and travel but not as my main camera.

I like the design and features of the DSLR design.